Why Using Trello for Feature Requests is a Bad Idea
Many indie developers and small teams start by using Trello for feature requests because it's free and familiar. However, Trello is a generic project management tool — it wasn't designed for collecting user feedback, and your users will notice.
User Friction Problems
With Trello, your users need to create a Trello account just to submit feedback. This creates significant friction and results in fewer feature requests. FeaturePulse removes this barrier entirely — users can submit feedback without any account creation.
The hidden cost of Trello
Every user who doesn't submit feedback because of account friction is valuable product insight you're losing. Purpose-built tools can increase feedback collection by 10x.
Automatic Status Notifications
When you implement a feature request in Trello, your users never know. Updates get lost in the board. FeaturePulse automatically notifies users when you change the status of their request, which helps reduce churn by showing customers you're listening.
Voting & Prioritization
Trello doesn't have a native voting system — you have to use workarounds like emoji reactions or Power-Ups. FeaturePulse has built-in feature voting with MRR weighting, so you can prioritize based on actual revenue impact.
Native App Experience
FeaturePulse provides a native SwiftUI SDK for iOS developers. With Trello, you'd need to send users out of your app entirely. This breaks the user experience and makes feedback feel like an afterthought.
Conclusion
Trello is great for project management, but it's the wrong tool for feature requests. FeaturePulse is purpose-built for collecting and prioritizing feedback with features like automatic notifications, voting, GitHub integration, and a native iOS SDK.